Published February 28, 2025

K-Pop Industry & Business

Can K-Pop Idol be Independent?

K-Pop is often seen as a world of glitz and glamour, but behind the polished performances and dazzling visuals, many fans wonder: just how much control do idols actually have over their careers? Are they independent artists, or are they simply following a script laid out by their agencies?

Contracts: The Fine Print

One of the biggest factors determining an idol’s independence is their contract. While Western artists often sign deals that allow for some degree of creative freedom, K-Pop contracts tend to be far more restrictive. Many idols are bound by what’s commonly known as a “slave contract,” a long-term agreement that gives the agency significant control over their schedules, creative work, and even personal lives.

In the West, artists typically sign 360 deals, where the label takes a percentage of income from multiple revenue streams, including album sales, touring, merch, and endorsements. K-Pop contracts, however, often go a step further, dictating not just financial terms but also an idol’s public image, behavior, and even appearance.

360-Deal-Contract-Template-_-Stcharleschill-Template.webp

Some contracts even include clauses that grant agencies perpetual rights over an idol’s likeness—yes, even in alternate universes if necessary!

The Agency’s Role: Business Over Art

One common misconception is that entertainment agencies exist purely to nurture talent and promote artistry. In reality, agencies are businesses first and foremost, aiming to maximize profits. This means idols are seen as investments. Companies provide training, production, and marketing, but in return, they expect to have a say in everything—from the music idols release to their hairstyles and social media presence.

Take the case of JYJ (Jaejoong, Yoochun, and Junsu), former members of TVXQ who took legal action against their agency, SM Entertainment.

They cited excessively long contracts, lack of creative freedom, and unfair profit distribution as reasons for their lawsuit. Their struggle highlighted the rigid control entertainment companies have over idols, restricting their ability to make independent artistic choices. Their case isn’t unique—many idols find themselves in similar situations, leading to legal battles and contract disputes.

The Fight for Creative Control

While most K-Pop idols start with little to no creative freedom, some manage to negotiate more independence as they gain popularity. Groups like BTS, Stray Kids, and IU are prime examples of artists who have carved out space for their own voices.

BTS, for instance, was granted creative control early on, a rare privilege in the industry. Similarly, IU took control of her music after her first album, allowing her to shape her career on her own terms.

Other idols renegotiate their contracts over time. MAMAMOO and (G)I-DLE, for example, gained more say in their music and schedules after proving their commercial worth.

MAMAMOO

(G)I-DLE

Agencies are more likely to grant creative control to idols who have already established themselves as valuable assets.

Can Idols Truly Be Independent?

At the end of the day, an idol’s independence depends on their leverage. If they have the star power and commercial success, they can push for more control. But for most rookies, the reality is that they must first work within the system, proving their worth before gaining the freedom to make their own artistic choices.

So, are K-Pop idols really independent? The answer is: it depends. While some have managed to break free from the rigid structure, most start their careers with very little autonomy. The industry is built on a system where agencies hold the power, and only those who can generate enough profit get a say in their careers.

For fans, this means supporting idols not just in their performances, but also in their journeys toward creative freedom. And for aspiring idols, it’s about understanding the trade-offs—being an artist in K-Pop isn’t just about making music, it’s also about navigating a highly controlled business model.

Independence in K-Pop isn’t impossible, but it’s definitely earned.

Related Video

Since their debut, BLACKPINK has been a powerhouse in the global music scene. As the members embark on their solo journeys, they bring unique styles and fresh perspectives to their music, allowing fans to witness their evolution as individual artists. Let’s take a closer look at how Jennie, Lisa, Rosé, and Jisoo are shaping their solo careers in 2025.

VCHA’s KG has made headlines after filing a lawsuit against JYP Entertainment in February, potentially explaining the group’s inactivity. The lawsuit raises significant questions about K-pop contracts, particularly for minors, and whether this case is about advocating for fair contracts or simply an attempt to be released from JYP.

The K-pop industry is no stranger to controversies, and the latest buzz involves NewJeans and the Korea Music Copyright Association (KMCA). With the group’s label ADOR caught up in internal conflicts with its parent company, HYBE, KMCA’s alleged boycott of NewJeans has sparked discussions about the legality of such actions—especially in light of the so-called “JYJ Act.” So, let’s break it down: what is the JYJ Act, how has it protected artists in the past, and is the NewJeans situation really the same?